Explore the Motion

Statement of Facts: A

STATE BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION

Last Revised • July 2, 2026

Statement of Facts A addresses issues relating to the North Carolina State Bureau of Investigation (SBI) Crime Laboratory and the forensic evidence discussed in the Supplemental Motion for Appropriate Relief. The motion argues that subsequent reviews, court findings, and public disclosures revealed concerns regarding certain SBI laboratory practices during the period relevant to the Defendant's prosecution. :contentReference[oaicite:0]{index=0}

The section first examines findings from independent reviews of the SBI Crime Laboratory, including concerns involving forensic reporting practices, DNA analysis, and the disclosure of potentially favorable evidence. It then examines the SBI's role in the Defendant's case, including forensic testing, trial testimony, and the physical evidence relied upon by the State. :contentReference[oaicite:1]{index=1}

The materials collected throughout Statement of Facts A are intended to help readers understand the forensic issues raised in the Supplemental Motion and the significance of the SBI's involvement in the prosecution.

Sections of Statement of Facts A

Independent Reviews of the SBI Crime Laboratory

Statement of Facts A • Paragraphs 7–15

Examines the findings of the 2010 Independent Review of the SBI Forensic Laboratory, subsequent disclosures involving forensic reporting practices, additional SBI case reviews, and judicial findings concerning laboratory procedures and evidence reporting.

Read Section →

SBI Involvement in the Defendant's Case

Statement of Facts A • Paragraphs 16–20

Examines the SBI's role in the prosecution of Lyle C. May, including forensic testing, DNA evidence, trial testimony, fingerprint evidence, and the significance of physical evidence discussed in the Supplemental Motion for Appropriate Relief.

Read Section →

SBI Involvement in the Defendant's Case

Trial Testimony of SBI Analyst Brenda Bissette

Trial Transcript

Materials relating to forensic testimony presented during the prosecution and discussed within the Supplemental Motion for Appropriate Relief.

Explore Source →