Repository Collection 03
Expert Mental Health Affidavits
EXPERT AFFIDAVIT ENTRY
Last Revised • July 9, 2026
This Source Verification Page documents the expert mental health affidavits referenced in Claim I of the Supplemental Motion. Although these affidavits are specifically cited in the motion, they were not included within the publicly available materials reviewed for this Source Verification Archive. The affidavits are expected to become available as exhibits during or following the evidentiary hearing and will be incorporated into this repository if they are released.
Related SMAR Citation
“[See affidavits of Moira Artigues MD, Thomas Hyde MD, Seymour Halleck MD, Pete Sansbury MD, and Claudia Coleman MD in the Defendant's original MAR and Amended MAR]”
Expert Affidavits Referenced
- Moira Artigues, M.D.
- Thomas Hyde, M.D.
- Seymour Halleck, M.D.
- Pete Sansbury, M.D.
- Claudia Coleman, M.D.
Verification Source
Referenced in the Supplemental Motion for Appropriate Relief.
Source Location
Referenced in Defendant's Original MAR and Amended MAR
Referenced in the Supplemental Motion
Page 40, Paragraph: 78
✔ Referenced in the Supplemental Motion
X Not available for independent review
X Publicly available source
✔ Included within the Source Verification Archive
✔ Expected to become publicly available if introduced as exhibits during the evidentiary hearing.
May's allegation that expert mental-health professionals concluded the Defendant's age, mental
illness, intoxication, and psychological condition at the time of his arrest and interrogation impaired
his ability to knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently waive his constitutional rights or provide a
reliable confession. The affidavits are cited in the SMAR as support for the claim that substantial
expert evidence exists regarding the Defendant's mental condition and its impact on the
voluntariness and reliability of his statements to law enforcement.
Source Status
Cited to Support
Supporting Documents
Current Status
No copies of the referenced expert affidavits have been obtained for inclusion within the Source Verification Archive.
Future Repository Updates
If these affidavits are admitted as exhibits or otherwise become publicly available following the evidentiary hearing, copies and highlighted research versions will be added to this page.
Continue Your Research
Return to Claim I
Continue browsing the sources cited throughout Claim I.
Return to Source Verification Archive
Return to the main Source Verification Archive and explore additional sections of the Supplemental Motion.