Repository Collection 03

State v. Lyle Clinton May Motion for Appropriate Relief

COURT FILING ENTRY

Last Revised • July 9, 2026

This Source Verification Page documents the Defendant's original Motion for Appropriate Relief filed on March 6, 2003. The filing is cited in Claim II of the Supplemental Motion because it demonstrates that allegations concerning the Defendant's mental condition, intoxication, youth, and the voluntariness of his confession were raised more than two decades before the present Supplemental Motion.

Related SMAR Citation

"[See also original MAR, pg. 31]"


Document Name

State v. Lyle Clinton May Motion for Appropriate Relief


Date

March 6, 2003


Referenced Page

31


Verification Source

Referenced in the Supplemental Motion for Appropriate Relief. Original filing maintained by Defendant's post-conviction counsel.


Source Location

Defendant's Motion for Appropriate Relief


Highlighted Pages

N/A


Referenced in the Supplemental Motion

Page 50, Paragraph: 101


Source Status

✔ Original Court Order obtained

X Not reviewed

X Not publicly available source

X Not included within the Source Verification Archive


Cited to Support

May's allegation that his unrecorded confession was unreliable and should not have been admitted because his severe intoxication, serious mental illness, youth, and the circumstances of the interrogation prevented a knowing waiver of rights and rendered any confession unreliable. May cites MAR Claim 1, Section C to establish that these allegations were previously raised in his original Motion for Appropriate Relief and supported by mental health expert affidavits. He further relies upon this claim to argue that if the confession is determined to be inadmissible or false, the physical evidence in the case becomes substantially more important in evaluating guilt or innocence.


Supporting Documents

Original Motion for Appropriate Relief

The original Motion for Appropriate Relief has been cited in the Supplemental Motion but was not available for independent review during preparation of this Source Verification Archive.

Document Not Yet Available →


Future Additions

If the original Motion for Appropriate Relief or the referenced page becomes available through court records or post-conviction counsel, it will be added to this section.


Continue Your Research

Return to Claim II

Continue browsing the sources cited throughout Claim II.

Browse Sources →

Return to Source Verification Archive

Return to the main Source Verification Archive and explore additional sections of the Supplemental Motion.

Browse Archive →