Repository Collection 03

Missing Guns, Drugs, and Money at Buncombe County Sheriff's Department

ARTICLE SOURCE ENTRY

Last Revised • July 6, 2026

This Source Verification Page documents a follow-up newspaper article reporting additional audit findings concerning evidence management within the Buncombe County Sheriff's Department. The article details missing firearms, narcotics, cash, and other evidence while discussing deficiencies in inventory controls and chain-of-custody procedures. It provides independent reporting relevant to the allegations presented throughout Statement of Facts B regarding evidence preservation and accountability.


Related SMAR Citation

["Missing guns, drugs, and money at Buncombe County Sheriff's Department", MountainXpress, 6/13/07]


Source Name

Missing guns, drugs, and money at Buncombe County Sheriff's Department


Author(s)

Cecil Bothwell


Publication

Mountain Xpress


Publication Date

June 13, 2007


Verification Source

Missing guns, drugs, and money at Buncombe County Sheriff's Department


Source Location

Mountain Xpress


Highlighted Pages

1 - 2


Referenced in the Supplemental Motion

Page 16, Paragraph: 22


Source Status

✔ Article obtained and reviewed.

✔ Relevant passages highlighted.

✔ Publicly available source

✔ Included within the Source Verification Archive


Cited to Support

May's allegation that serious deficiencies within the Buncombe County Sheriff's Department evidence room extended beyond isolated inventory discrepancies and reflected systemic failures in evidence management and chain-of-custody procedures. The Mountain Xpress article is cited to document audit findings identifying poor inventory controls, missing evidence, compromised evidence packaging, failures in chain-of-custody documentation, and the inability to account for substantial quantities of cash, firearms, and narcotics. May relies upon this source to support his claim that deficiencies in evidence handling created conditions that could compromise criminal prosecutions, undermine confidence in the integrity of physical evidence, and potentially affect the reliability of past convictions.


Supporting Documents

Original Article

Link to the original article.

View Website →


Highlighted Research Copy

Working research copy containing the highlighted passages cited in the Supplemental Motion.

View PDF →


Continue Your Research

Return to Statement of Facts B

Continue browsing the sources cited throughout Statement of Facts B.

Browse Sources →

Return to Source Verification Archive

Return to the main Source Verification Archive and explore additional sections of the Supplemental Motion.

Browse Archive →