Repository Collection 03

The $8 Million Case Against Buncombe

ARTICLE SOURCE ENTRY

Last Revised • July 7, 2026

This Source Verification Page documents an Asheville Citizen-Times article examining the civil lawsuit filed by Larry Williams Jr. against Buncombe County and numerous law enforcement officials. The article reports allegations concerning an unrecorded interrogation, coercive questioning, and the circumstances surrounding Williams's confession. The Supplemental Motion relies upon this reporting in Statement of Facts D to provide independent documentation regarding investigative practices employed during the period of Lyle May's prosecution.


Related SMAR Citation

"[Asheville Citizen Times]"


Source Name

The $8 Million Case Against Buncombe


Author(s)

Tonya Maxwell


Publication

Asheville Citizen-Times


Publication Date

May 7, 2016


Verification Source

Asheville Citizen-Times


Source Location

Asheville Citizen-Times


Highlighted Pages

11 - 14


Referenced in the Supplemental Motion

Page 27, Paragraph: 47


Source Status

✔ Article obtained and reviewed.

✔ Relevant passages highlighted.

✔ Publicly available source

✔ Included within the Source Verification Archive


Cited to Support

May's allegation that Larry Williams Jr. was subjected to a coercive, unrecorded interrogation conducted by law enforcement officials and prosecutors during the Walter Bowman homicide investigation. The Asheville Citizen-Times article is cited to document reporting that Williams, then sixteen years old, was questioned by officials including District Attorney Ron Moore and Sheriff Bobby Medford, was threatened with life imprisonment, and ultimately provided statements implicating himself and others. May relies upon this source to support his claim that coercive interrogation practices were employed in Buncombe County criminal investigations and that such practices contributed to false or unreliable statements later used in criminal prosecutions. May further cites the article to document the involvement of APD Detective Forrest Weaver in Williams' interrogation and to support his allegation that Detective Weaver also participated in the Defendant's investigation by witnessing the Defendant's written confession.


Supporting Documents

Original Article

Link to the original article.

View Website →


Highlighted Research Copy

Working research copy containing the highlighted passages cited in the Supplemental Motion.

View PDF →


Continue Your Research

Return to Statement of Facts D

Continue browsing the sources cited throughout Statement of Facts D.

Browse Sources →

Return to Source Verification Archive

Return to the main Source Verification Archive and explore additional sections of the Supplemental Motion.

Browse Archive →