Repository Collection 03

Buncombe County District Attorney Debate: Challenging Questions Before May 6 Primary Election

ARTICLE SOURCE ENTRY

Last Revised • July 8, 2026

This Source Verification Page documents a Mountain Xpress article covering the 2014 Buncombe County District Attorney debate. The article reports on public statements made by District Attorney Ron Moore concerning his office's prosecution of capital cases, the number of death penalty prosecutions handled during his tenure, and the experience of prosecutors assigned to those cases. Statement of Facts D cites this article to document the experience and responsibilities of prosecutors involved in capital litigation during the period relevant to the Supplemental Motion.


Related SMAR Citation

"[Buncombe County District Attorney Debate: Challenging Questions before May 6th primary election", by Hayley Benton]


Source Name

Buncombe County District Attorney Debate: Challenging Questions Before May 6 Primary Election


Author(s)

Hayley Benton


Publication

Mountain Xpress


Publication Date

April 12, 2014


Verification Source

Buncombe County District Attorney Debate: Challenging Questions Before May 6 Primary Election


Source Location

Mountain Xpress


Highlighted Pages

4


Referenced in the Supplemental Motion

Page 34, Paragraph: 60


Source Status

✔ Article obtained and reviewed.

✔ Relevant passages highlighted.

✔ Publicly available source

✔ Included within the Source Verification Archive


Cited to Support

May's allegation that former Buncombe County District Attorney Ron Moore and Assistant District Attorney Kate Dreher possessed substantial experience prosecuting capital cases and were highly familiar with the procedures, training, and legal obligations associated with death-penalty litigation. The Mountain Xpress article is cited to document Moore's public statements regarding the number of capital cases he prosecuted, the frequency with which he sought death sentences, and the specialized training and experience of prosecutors within his office. May relies upon this source to support his claim that Moore and Dreher were experienced capital litigators whose actions and decisions in capital cases were made with a full understanding of the legal and ethical responsibilities associated with such prosecutions.


Supporting Documents

Original Article

Link to the original article.

View Website →


Highlighted Research Copy

Working research copy containing the highlighted passages cited in the Supplemental Motion.

View PDF →


Continue Your Research

Return to Statement of Facts D

Continue browsing the sources cited throughout Statement of Facts D.

Browse Sources →

Return to Source Verification Archive

Return to the main Source Verification Archive and explore additional sections of the Supplemental Motion.

Browse Archive →