Repository Collection 03

Former Buncombe Prosecutor Pleads the Fifth

ARTICLE SOURCE ENTRY

Last Revised • July 7, 2026

This Source Verification Page documents an Asheville Citizen-Times article reporting on former Buncombe County Assistant District Attorney Kate Dreher's deposition testimony in civil litigation arising from the wrongful convictions of Robert Wilcoxson and Kenneth Kagonyera. The article discusses Dreher's invocation of her Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination and provides additional context regarding allegations involving the handling and disclosure of evidence. Statement of Facts D relies upon this reporting to document concerns regarding prosecutorial conduct and evidence disclosure practices.


Related SMAR Citation

“[Prison Legal News]”


Source Name

Former Buncombe Prosecutor Pleads the Fifth


Author(s)

Jon Ostendorff


Publication

Asheville Citizen-Times


Publication Date

December 12, 2014


Verification Source

Former Buncombe Prosecutor Pleads the Fifth


Source Location

Asheville Citizen-Times


Highlighted Pages

1 - 2


Referenced in the Supplemental Motion

Page 28, Paragraph: 48


Source Status

✔ Article obtained and reviewed.

✔ Relevant passages highlighted.

✔ Publicly available source

✔ Included within the Source Verification Archive


Cited to Support

May's allegation that former Assistant District Attorney Kate Dreher was required to appear for a deposition in civil litigation arising from the wrongful convictions of Robert Wilcoxson and Kenneth Kagonyera and invoked her Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination during questioning. The Asheville Citizen-Times article is cited to document reporting concerning Dreher's deposition testimony, her invocation of the Fifth Amendment, and allegations raised in the underlying litigation regarding the withholding of evidence favorable to the defense. May relies upon this source to support his claim that prosecutorial conduct in the Wilcoxson-Kagonyera matter became the subject of civil litigation and scrutiny concerning the handling and disclosure of evidence.


Supporting Documents

Original Article

Link to the original article.

View Website →


Highlighted Research Copy

Working research copy containing the highlighted passages cited in the Supplemental Motion.

View PDF →


Continue Your Research

Return to Statement of Facts D

Continue browsing the sources cited throughout Statement of Facts D.

Browse Sources →

Return to Source Verification Archive

Return to the main Source Verification Archive and explore additional sections of the Supplemental Motion.

Browse Archive →