Repository Collection 03
Richard Eugene Glossip v. State of Oklahoma
COURT FILING ENTRY
Last Revised • July 8, 2026
This Source Verification Page documents an amicus curiae brief filed before the Supreme Court of the United States in Richard Eugene Glossip v. State of Oklahoma. The brief was submitted by a coalition of current and former state and federal prosecutors and supports the petition for post-conviction relief. Statement of Facts D cites this filing to document Buncombe County District Attorney Todd Williams' participation in the amicus brief and his association with prosecutors advocating relief in a case involving allegations of prosecutorial misconduct and evidentiary irregularities.
Related SMAR Citation
[Richard Eugene Glossip v. State of Oklahoma,
On Writ of Certiorari to the Oklahoma Court of
Criminal Appeals;
Brief of Current and Former State and Federal Prosecutors
as Amici Curiae in
Support of Petitioner Richard Glossip, 4/30/24]
Case Name
Richard Eugene Glossip v. State of Oklahoma
Document
Brief of Current and Former State and Federal Prosecutors as Amici Curiae in Support of Petitioner Richard Glossip
Date
April 30, 2024
Verification Source
Brief of Current and Former State and Federal Prosecutors as Amici Curiae in Support of Petitioner Richard Glossip
Source Location
Supreme Court of the United States
Highlighted Pages
Title, 1, 14, Appendix Page 4a
Referenced in the Supplemental Motion
Page 35, Paragraph: 64
✔ Original amicus curiae brief obtained, reviewed, and verified
✔ Relevant passages highlighted.
✔ Publicly available copy located through the official United States Supreme Court docket
✔ Included within the Source Verification Archive
May's allegation that on April 30, 2024, Buncombe County District Attorney Todd Williams joined a
coalition of current and former state and federal prosecutors in filing an amicus curiae brief in support
of Oklahoma death-row prisoner Richard Glossip before the Supreme Court of the United States. The
amicus brief is cited to establish Williams' participation in the filing and his association with a group of
prosecutors advocating relief in a case involving allegations of prosecutorial misconduct and
evidentiary irregularities.
Source Status
Cited to Support
Supporting Documents
Original Article
Link to the original article.
Highlighted Research Copy
Working research copy containing the highlighted passages cited in the Supplemental Motion.
Continue Your Research
Return to Statement of Facts D
Continue browsing the sources cited throughout Statement of Facts D.
Return to Source Verification Archive
Return to the main Source Verification Archive and explore additional sections of the Supplemental Motion.