Repository Collection 03
NC Prosecutor Explains How Innocent Men Were Jailed for Murder
SUPPLEMENTAL ARTICLE SOURCE ENTRY
Last Revised • July 7, 2026
This Source Verification Page documents a supplemental news article published by WFMY News 2 concerning Buncombe County officials' public response to scrutiny surrounding the Mary Elizabeth Judd investigation. The article reports on District Attorney Ron Moore's review of the case and his submission of an eleven-page letter defending the actions of the Buncombe County Sheriff's Office and District Attorney's Office. It is included as a supplemental source providing additional context for Statement of Facts D.
Related SMAR Citation
“[Asheville Citizen Times]”
Source Name
NC Prosecutor Explains How Innocent Men Were Jailed for Murder
Author(s)
WFMY Staff
Publication
WFMY News 2
Publication Date
December 2, 2003
Verification Source
NC Prosecutor Explains How Innocent Men Were Jailed for Murder
Source Location
WFMY News 2
Highlighted Pages
1 - 2
Referenced in the Supplemental Motion
Page 28 - 29, Paragraph: 50
✔ Article obtained and reviewed.
✔ Relevant passages highlighted.
✔ Publicly available source
✔ Included within the Source Verification Archive
May's allegation that following public scrutiny of the Mary Elizabeth Judd investigation and the
recantation of key witness Lynette Smith, Buncombe County officials were required to defend the
conduct of the investigation and prosecution. The WFMY News 2 article is cited to document reporting
that District Attorney Ron Moore reviewed the case and submitted an 11-page letter to Attorney
General Roy Cooper defending the actions of the Buncombe County Sheriff's Office and District
Attorney's Office. The article further reports Moore's position that Sheriff Bobby Medford committed no
wrongdoing and discusses explanations offered for the lengthy incarceration of John Collins and David
Hammack. May relies upon this source to support his claim that concerns regarding the handling of
the Judd investigation prompted public scrutiny and official efforts to defend the conduct of law
enforcement and prosecutors involved in the case.
Source Status
Cited to Support
Supporting Documents
Original Article
Link to the original article.
Highlighted Research Copy
Working research copy containing the highlighted passages cited in the Supplemental Motion.
Continue Your Research
Return to Statement of Facts D
Continue browsing the sources cited throughout Statement of Facts D.
Return to Source Verification Archive
Return to the main Source Verification Archive and explore additional sections of the Supplemental Motion.