Repository Collection 03
State v. Jamie Lamont Smith
CASE ENTRY
Last Revised • July 7, 2026
This Source Verification Page documents the criminal case of State v. Jamie Lamont Smith, which is cited in Statement of Facts D of the Supplemental Motion. The underlying post-conviction filings referenced in the Supplemental Motion were not available for inclusion within the Source Verification Archive at the time this page was prepared. This page documents the cited case and explains the role it serves in supporting the allegations presented in the Supplemental Motion.
Related SMAR Citation
“[State v. Jamie Lamont Smith, Buncombe County Superior Court Nos: 95 CRS 2919-20, 3068-9, 51504-6, 63274-5; Supplemental MAR and Brief of the Defendant in Support of Bats on Claim]”
Case Name
State v. Jamie Lamont Smith
Citation
Buncombe County Superior Court Nos. 95 CRS 2919-20, 3068-9, 51504-6, 63274-5
Referenced in the Supplemental Motion
Page 29 - 30, Paragraph: 52
X Article obtained and reviewed.
X Relevant passages highlighted.
X Publicly available source
X Included within the Source Verification Archive
May's allegation that post-conviction litigation in State v. Jamie Lamont Smith involved claims
concerning the preservation, destruction, and availability of prosecutorial records relevant to a
Batson challenge. According to the source cited in the SMAR, counsel reviewing the prosecution's
files found significant absences in materials related to jury selection, including prosecutor notes,
juror questionnaires, criminal-record-check information, and other documents that could reveal
prosecutorial motives for peremptory strikes. May relies upon the Smith litigation to support his
claim that the destruction or unavailability of jury-selection records was not limited to a single
Buncombe County capital case and that similar issues allegedly affected multiple prosecutions
handled by the Buncombe County District Attorney's Office.
Source Status
Cited to Support
Supporting Documents
Currently Available
No public copy of the referenced Supplemental Motion for Appropriate Relief or supporting brief was available for inclusion within the Source Verification Archive.
Future Updates
If the referenced filings become publicly available or are obtained for research purposes, they will be added to this page together with any highlighted research copies.
Continue Your Research
Return to Statement of Facts D
Continue browsing the sources cited throughout Statement of Facts D.
Return to Source Verification Archive
Return to the main Source Verification Archive and explore additional sections of the Supplemental Motion.