Repository Collection 03

State v. Marcus Robinson

COURT ORDER ENTRY

Last Revised • July 8, 2026

This Source Verification Page documents the Order Granting Motion for Appropriate Relief entered in State v. Marcus Robinson by Judge Gregory A. Weeks. The order addresses evidence presented during litigation concerning prosecutorial jury-selection practices and discusses the use of race-neutral justifications taught during prosecutor training. Statement of Facts D cites this order to document judicial findings regarding the relationship between prosecutorial training materials and the exercise of peremptory strikes.


Related SMAR Citation

"Robinson Order at 360"


Case Name

State v. Marcus Robinson


Judge

Gregory A. Weeks


Date

April 20, 2012


Verification Source

State v. Marcus Robinson, Order Granting Motion for Appropriate Relief


Source Location

Cumberland County Superior Court


Highlighted Pages

1, 156–157


Referenced in the Supplemental Motion

Page 34, Paragraph: 62


Source Status

✔ Original Court Order obtained and reviewed.

✔ Relevant passages highlighted.

✔ Publicly available source

✔ Included within the Source Verification Archive


Cited to Support

May's allegation that prosecutorial training provided through the North Carolina Conference of District Attorneys emphasized the development and articulation of race-neutral explanations for peremptory strikes rather than the prevention of discriminatory jury-selection practices. The Robinson Order is cited to establish Judge Gregory Weeks' finding that prosecutors relied upon training materials designed to help avoid successful Batson challenges and that examples presented in the litigation demonstrated the use of pretextual race-neutral justifications during jury selection. May relies upon this finding to support his claim that the training received by prosecutors, including ADA Kate Dreher through the Top Gun II CLE program, encouraged practices that could conceal discriminatory motives behind peremptory strikes in capital prosecutions.


Supporting Documents

Original Article

Link to the original article.

View Website →


Highlighted Research Copy

Working research copy containing the highlighted passages cited in the Supplemental Motion.

View PDF →


Continue Your Research

Return to Statement of Facts D

Continue browsing the sources cited throughout Statement of Facts D.

Browse Sources →

Return to Source Verification Archive

Return to the main Source Verification Archive and explore additional sections of the Supplemental Motion.

Browse Archive →