Repository Collection 03

Fact Check: Did the North Carolina State Crime Lab Mishandle Evidence in Hundreds of Cases on Attorney General Roy Cooper's Watch?

SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT ENTRY

Last Revised • July 3, 2026

This supplemental report is an independent article published by Ballotpedia summarizing the findings of the Swecker-Wolf Report and the resulting reforms within the North Carolina State Bureau of Investigation Crime Laboratory. The article provides additional context regarding laboratory reporting deficiencies, forensic misconduct, and statewide corrective actions, serving as an independently published source supporting the findings discussed throughout Statement of Facts A.


Related SMAR Citation

Related to "“[An Independent Review of the SBI Forensic Laboratory. Chris Swecker, Attorney at Law; Michael Wolf, Consultant. 2010]”


Source Name

Fact Check: Did the North Carolina State Crime Lab Mishandle Evidence in Hundreds of Cases on Attorney General Roy Cooper's Watch?


Author(s)

Fact Check by Ballotpedia Staff


Publication Date

September 16, 2016


Verification Source

Ballotpedia


Source Location

Ballotpedia


Highlighted Pages

2 - 5


Referenced in the Supplemental Motion

N/A - Supplemental Report to Swecker-Wolf Report


Source Status

✔ Supplemental source recovered and reviewed

✔ Article independently summarizes and discusses the findings of the Swecker-Wolf Report and related SBI reforms

✔ Publicly available source

✔ Included within the Source Verification Archive


Cited to Support

Supplemental verification of the Swecker-Wolf Report findings concerning SBI laboratory reporting practices, forensic reporting deficiencies, and the omission of negative or inconclusive confirmatory test results from laboratory reports. The Ballotpedia fact-check article is cited as an independent secondary source summarizing the findings of the Swecker-Wolf review, including concerns regarding misreported forensic results, the scope of affected cases, and the reforms implemented following the review. This source is included to provide additional context and independent discussion of the misconduct and reporting practices documented in the Swecker-Wolf Report.


Supporting Documents

Original Article

Link to the original article.

View Website →


Highlighted Research Copy

Working research copy containing the highlighted passages cited in the Supplemental Motion.

View PDF →


Continue Your Research

Return to Statement of Facts A

Continue browsing the sources cited throughout Statement of Facts A.

Browse Sources →

Return to Source Verification Archive

Return to the main Source Verification Archive and explore additional sections of the Supplemental Motion.

Browse Archive →