Repository Collection 03
SBI bloodstain analysis team went leaderless for 21 years
ARTICLE SOURCE TRACE ENTRY
Last Revised • July 3, 2026
This archived newspaper source documents public discussion surrounding the broader implications of problems identified within the North Carolina State Bureau of Investigation. Although the original article is no longer available, the publication trail and quoted statement were independently verified through archived records and are included to document contemporaneous public concern regarding SBI oversight and management.
Related SMAR Citation
“("SBI bloodstain analysis team went leaderless for 21 years", News and Observer, September 9, 2010)”
Quoted Statement
“At this point, everything at the SBI is open for discussion”
Speaker
Seth Edwards
President of the North Carolina Conference of District Attorneys
Source Name
“DAs demand full SBI audit”
Author(s)
Staff
Publication Date
September 9, 2010
Verification Source
NC Newsline / NC Policy Watch archive trail
Source Location
News & Observer special report on SBI laboratory practices
Highlighted Pages
N/A
Referenced in the Supplemental Motion
Page 11, Paragraph: 11
✔ Article title, publication trail, and quoted statement identified
X Original article body not obtained
✔ Archived shell page located.
X Not Included within the Source Verification Archive
May's allegation that concerns regarding SBI Crime Laboratory practices were not limited to
defense attorneys, innocence advocates, or independent reviewers. The News & Observer article
is cited to establish that the North Carolina Conference of District Attorneys publicly called for a full
audit of the SBI Crime Laboratory following revelations of forensic misconduct. May relies upon
this article to support his claim that concerns regarding the reliability, oversight, and integrity of
SBI forensic practices were so significant that they were acknowledged by the prosecutorial
community itself, demonstrating that the problems identified within the SBI laboratory were widely
recognized and not confined to criticism from criminal defendants or their advocates.
Link to the Archived Shell Page.
Working research copy containing the highlighted passages cited in the Supplemental Motion.
Continue browsing the sources cited throughout Statement of Facts A.
Return to the main Source Verification Archive and explore additional sections of the Supplemental Motion.
Source Status
Cited to Support
Supporting Documents
Archived Shell Page
Highlighted Research Copy
Continue Your Research
Return to Statement of Facts A
Return to Source Verification Archive