Repository Collection 03

SBI's methods stun former FBI official

ARTICLE SOURCE ENTRY

Last Revised • July 3, 2026

This newspaper article reports on public statements made by Chris Swecker regarding deficiencies within the North Carolina State Bureau of Investigation Crime Laboratory. The article provides contemporaneous reporting on concerns about laboratory procedures, reporting practices, and forensic oversight, offering independent context for the allegations discussed throughout Statement of Facts A.


Related SMAR Citation

"SBI practices stun former highranking FBI official ", Charlotte Observer


Source Name

SBI's methods stun former FBI official


Author(s)

Peter St. Onge


Publication Date

September 16, 2016


Verification Source

"SBI's methods stun former FBI official," The News & Observer (Raleigh)


Source Location

News & Observer special report on SBI laboratory practices


Highlighted Pages

2


Referenced in the Supplemental Motion

Page 11, Paragraph: 10


Source Status

✔ Article obtained and reviewed.

✔ Relevant passages highlighted.

✔ Publicly available source

✔ Included within the Source Verification Archive


Cited to Support

May's allegation that the deficiencies identified within the SBI Crime Laboratory resulted from broader problems in laboratory policies, oversight, and reporting practices rather than isolated analyst mistakes. The article is cited to document Chris Swecker's public statement that he was surprised by the "looseness" of SBI laboratory procedures and reporting policies, which created a subjective environment for forensic casework. May relies upon Swecker's observations to support his claim that the misconduct and reporting deficiencies identified in the Swecker-Wolf Report were systemic in nature and capable of affecting numerous criminal prosecutions, including cases involving SBI forensic evidence such as his own.


Supporting Documents

Original Article

Link to the original article.

View Website →


Highlighted Research Copy

Working research copy containing the highlighted passages cited in the Supplemental Motion.

View PDF →


Continue Your Research

Return to Statement of Facts A

Continue browsing the sources cited throughout Statement of Facts A.

Browse Sources →

Return to Source Verification Archive

Return to the main Source Verification Archive and explore additional sections of the Supplemental Motion.

Browse Archive →