Repository Collection 03

On Trial for Their Lives: The Hidden Costs of Wrongful Capital Prosecutions in North Carolina

SUPPLEMENTAL SOURCE ENTRY

Last Revised • July 11, 2026

This Source Verification Page documents the Center for Death Penalty Litigation report On Trial for Their Lives: The Hidden Costs of Wrongful Capital Prosecutions in North Carolina, cited in Claim III of the Supplemental Motion. The report provides supplemental authority documenting wrongful capital prosecutions in North Carolina and includes a discussion of the Glen Edward Chapman case as an example of prosecutorial misconduct, suppressed exculpatory evidence, and wrongful conviction. It is included to provide additional context supporting the allegations presented in Paragraph 121 of the Supplemental Motion.


Related SMAR Citation

On Trial for Their Lives: The Hidden Costs of Wrongful Capital Prosecutions in North Carolina


Author(s)

The Center for Death Penalty Litigation


Publication

On Trial for Their Lives: The Hidden Costs of Wrongful Capital Prosecutions in North Carolina


Publication Date

June 2015


Verification Source

Original Center for Death Penalty Litigation report obtained and reviewed.


Source Location

The Center for Death Penalty Litigation


Highlighted Pages

Title Page, 26–27, 36–38


Referenced in the Supplemental Motion

Page 58 - 59, Paragraph: 121


Source Status

✔ Obtained and reviewed.

✔ Relevant passages highlighted.

✔ Publicly available source

✔ Included within the Source Verification Archive


Cited to Support

May's allegation that North Carolina courts have granted post-conviction relief where prosecutors failed to disclose material impeachment evidence concerning key prosecution witnesses. The Jonathon Hoffman case is cited as an example in which the prosecution concealed benefits provided to a principal witness, including immunity from federal prosecution and financial compensation, depriving the defense of material impeachment evidence. May relies upon Hoffman to illustrate that the concealment of material impeachment evidence affecting witness credibility has resulted in the vacatur of convictions and subsequent exoneration in North Carolina.


Supporting Documents

Original Article

Link to the original article.

View Website →


Highlighted Research Copy

Working research copy containing the highlighted passages cited in the Supplemental Motion.

View PDF →


Continue Your Research

Return to Claim III

Continue browsing the sources cited throughout Claim III.

Browse Sources →

Return to Source Verification Archive

Return to the main Source Verification Archive and explore additional sections of the Supplemental Motion.

Browse Archive →