Repository Collection 03
Claim III
SOURCE VERIFICATION ARCHIVE
Last Revised • July 2, 2026
This collection contains the publicly available authorities, court decisions, government records, investigative materials, and supporting documentation cited throughout Claim III of the Supplemental Motion. These sources support the Defendant's allegations regarding cumulative prejudice, the combined effect of constitutional violations, and the resulting denial of a fair trial.
Browse Supporting Sources
1"State v. Ronnie Long: Cabarrus Co. Willful police misconduct, mishandling of evidence, and prosecutorial failures led to vacatur and exoneration."
As Cited in the Supplemental Motion
Verified Source
State v. Ronnie Long
National Registry of Exonerations Case Profile
The National Registry of Exonerations
"State v. Dontae (Montoyae) Sharp: Pitt Co. Prosecutorial misconduct in handling forensic theory and investigative practices led to vacatur and exoneration."
As Cited in the Supplemental Motion
Verified Source
State v. Dontae Sharpe
National Registry of Exonerations Case Profile
The National Registry of Exonerations
"State v. Mike Parker: Henderson Co. SBI mishandled evidence, presenting chain-of-custody failures, and DA's theory contradicted by later forensic review led to vacatur"
As Cited in the Supplemental Motion
Verified Source
State v. Michael Parker
National Registry of Exonerations Case Profile
The National Registry of Exonerations
"State v. Jonathan Hoffman: Union Co. Police informant deals concealed; prosecutors withheld impeachment and witness reliability information, led to vacatur."
As Cited in the Supplemental Motion
Verified Source
State v. Jonathon Hoffman
National Registry of Exonerations Case Profile
The National Registry of Exonerations
"State v. Glen Edward Chapman: Catawba Co. Police informant withheld exculpatory evidence and concealed alternative suspect evidence; prosecutors built argument on incomplete/contaminated case file led to vacatur and exoneration."
As Cited in the Supplemental Motion
Verified Source
State v. Glen Edward Chapman
National Registry of Exonerations Case Profile
The National Registry of Exonerations
"State v. Larry Lamb: Duplin Co. Sheriff's detectives coerced witness; prosecutor failed to disclose contradictory statements and compensation arrangement led to vacatur."
As Cited in the Supplemental Motion
Verified Source
State v. Larry Lamb
National Registry of Exonerations Case Profile
The National Registry of Exonerations
"On Trial for Their Lives: The Hidden Costs of Wrongful Capital Prosecutions in North Carolina"
As Cited in the Supplemental Motion
Verified Source
On Trial for Their Lives: The Hidden Costs of Wrongful Capital Prosecutions in North Carolina
Center for Death Penalty Litigation (June 2015)
Center for Death Penalty Litigation
"[See Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963)…"
As Cited in the Supplemental Motion
Verified Source
Brady v. Maryland
373 U.S. 83 (1963)
Supreme Court of the United States
“Giglio v. United States, 405 U.S. 150 (1972)”
As Cited in the Supplemental Motion
Verified Source
Giglio v. United States
405 U.S. 150 (1972)
Supreme Court of the United States
"['Wrongfully imprisoned advocates urge Buncombe to create exoneration unit' Asheville Watchdog, 4/17/24]"
As Cited in the Supplemental Motion
Verified Source
Wrongfully imprisoned: Advocates urge Buncombe to create exoneration unit
Asheville Watchdog (April 17, 2024)
Asheville Watchdog
"In re Spivey, 345 N.C. 404, 480 S.E.2d 693 (1997)"
As Cited in the Supplemental Motion
Verified Source
In re Spivey
345 N.C. 404, 480 S.E.2d 693 (1997)
North Carolina Supreme Court
"[See: Chicago Police Torture Archive and…]"
As Cited in the Supplemental Motion
Verified Source
Chicago Police Torture Archive
Official Website
Chicago Police Torture Archive
"...Death Penalty Information Center"
As Cited in the Supplemental Motion
Verified Source
Death Penalty Information Center
Official Website
Death Penalty Information Center
Continue Your Research
Return to Source Verification Archive
Return to the Source Verification Archive and browse other sections of the Supplemental Motion.
Explore the Motion: Claim III
Return to the corresponding section of the Supplemental Motion.